Rate Yourself
How consistently do you do this? (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree)
I can describe the ideal candidate for my key roles in terms of observable behaviors, not abstractions.
I have translated values like 'integrity' into specific actions I can watch for.
I know the difference between what a role requires on paper and what success actually looks like.
I have asked our most experienced people what behaviors distinguish top performers.
I define who I'm looking for before I start evaluating candidates.
I can articulate what cultural fit means here in concrete terms.
I evaluate candidates against a defined standard, not against each other.
I resist redefining the target mid-search to fit an available candidate.
I look for evidence of behaviors, not just claims about qualities.
My picture of the ideal hire is based on people who actually succeeded here.